« Quote of the day: How the French see Obama | Main | Obama won Nevada? »

Et tu, Congress? House joins Bush in ignoring the NIE

On Wednesday Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (H R 4986), which among other things, effectively declared Iran an (eventual) nuclear threat to the United States. This, after the National Intelligence Estimate from last November concluded that Iran had stopped its nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003 and it had remained halted as of mid-2007.

The text from Section 229 of the Act:

Congress finds that Iran maintains a nuclear program in continued defiance of the international community while developing ballistic missiles of increasing sophistication and range that:
(1) pose a threat to--
(A) the forward-deployed forces of the United States;
(B) North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies in Europe; and
(C) other allies and friendly foreign countries in the region; and
(2) eventually could pose a threat to the United States homeland.

The Act goes on to call for the U.S. to "develop, test, and deploy, as soon as technologically feasible, in conjunction with allies and friendly foreign countries whenever possible, an effective defense against the threat from Iran." Is this a call for a missile-defense system or something more aggressive?

Bush has ignored the NIE findings from day one and has continued to beat the drums of war. That was no surprise; I just assumed that when the intelligence community contradicted his WMD fear-mongering this time around, he would simply be ignored.

But when legislators aren't held accountable for their votes, why would they worry about accurate intelligence or the consequences of their decisions? How many of Senators who voted for war five years ago, when Bush was makings similar false WMD claims about Iraq, have lost their reelection bids? Hell, two of the three top contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination voted to go to war in 2003. We have only ourselves and our short memories to blame. We can hold politicians accountable, yet we let them deflect blame and spin their votes for war as votes for peace, and we forgive them with our votes and our partisan support.

The bill will now go to the Senate, and I'm interested to see how Senators Obama and Clinton handle this issue.

Like this post? Get updates via RSS or email.

|

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ablogistan.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/360.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Et tu, Congress? House joins Bush in ignoring the NIE:

» Blog me up, Buttercups from Prose Before Hos
Blog Roundup, this week in an easy 1 to 10 fashion. This better keep you god damn occupied! 1. Why the media hates Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich. Did you notice a pattern? Both Paul and Kucinich are against the influence of lobbyists, war profiteers, de... [Read More]

Comments (3)

hey, keep me posted on this... i heard about it briefly today... and i LOVE your question, how will those democrats vote... hee hee... i am betting that they both will support it (after all, they are members of the council on foreign relations, and answer first to the "system" they serve)... you?

Posted by gregory | January 18, 2008 9:56 AM

Gregory: I'd be a little surprised if they both showed up to vote, honestly. I would expect Obama to vote against it before Clinton, but after taking flak for supporting the Kyl-Lieberman amendment, she may decide to oppose it as well.

Can you explain (or provide links explaining) your issue with the CFR? I know there are many theories (some might say conspiracy theories) floating around regarding the CFR's influence over foreign affairs, but I am not convinced that they're as deliberately nefarious as many believe.

Posted by Elyas | January 18, 2008 11:15 AM

i will dig around a bit, sites are pretty polarized, hard to find "truth"

my opinion, the entrenched mindset of how the world works is my objection, with inertia, vested interests, unrealistic "real politik", connections to funds and funding, and old school ties all acting to limit a more valuable and pragmatic understanding that we all on this planet are in it together, and need to think in different ways .... aipac is in there somewhere too

but, you know, opinions, yuck...

enjoy, gregory

Posted by gregory | January 19, 2008 2:44 AM

Post a comment